Clan Johnson, Johnston, Johnstone FTDNA-Y-DNA

County Fermanagh, Johnston, of the Scottish Johnstone is second. https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Johnson/default.aspx?section=yresults https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Carruthers?iframe=yresults

Wonder where that I-CTS11603 Y-DNA is from.

https://named.publicprofiler.org/

Carruthers likely from a single male I-CTS11603 Y-DNA, which does not seem to have any matches to the Brus/Bruce family but relation of Mouswald Carruthers, seem to share the same shield with the Pickering of Oswaldkirk, Yorkshire, Brus/Bruce family relations. Noted, share Y-DNA first 12 markers with Cave ‘de Cave’, and Scarborough. The Bruce had land of Cave, North and South, in east Riding Yorkshire, and in Annandale, land also of the Nicholas Stuteville (Nicholforest), and Wake families. The Stuteville had land of Gresham Castle, and Scarborough region, also of The Mote, which had Liddel Strength Castle on it of the Wake and Stuteville. No previous is pretty rough, but feel people are checking the research.  added 4/9/2020

How family members are being successful at family history; 

Brigham ‘This is the Place’ genealogy with DNA applied

The family knows best.
Listen to others, especially of the opposite sex, to make family.
Do not in a family search, get rid of the in-laws, though you may want to.
Families fight, and likely not just one answer is correct, in the history.
If the family’s history is done properly one does not get to pick their ancestors.
THE FAMILY KNOWS BEST.
When a person lets say MrX, on FTDNA MrX surname blog, says something about his family tree, and MZ says he is a liar, because MZ administrates the FTDNA blog, who is most likely correct MrX or MZ?
LISTEN TO OTHERS, ESPECIALLY OF THE OPPSOITE SEX, TO MAKE FAMILY.
People need another point of view, and the family tree can not exist without males and females, because that is what it takes to make a family tree.
DO NOT IN A FAMILY SEARCH, GET RID OF THE IN-LAWS, THOUGH YOU MAY WANT TO.
For instance the males carry the Y-DNA. To put a female MZ, in charge of FTDNA blogs MrA-MrY, with the power of kicking people out of the blog anyone she likes to is that genealogy or Corporate Profit Making?
Can a person be kicked out of their family tree?
FAMILIES FIGHT, AND LIKELY NOT JUST ONE ANSWER IS CORRECT, IN THE HISTORY.
Say two people of the same family have a disagreement on a point. One of the two researchers the other person’s position, and find it to be correct also. The other does not. Who has gained knowledge of the family tree, and is acting in the manner of a true family historian/genealogist?
IF THE FAMILY’S HISTORY IS DONE PROPERLY ONE DOES NOT GET TO PICK THEIR ANCESTORS.
Needs no commit.
Family History as opposed to History, to identify individuals, has to utilize more documentation on the subject manner then History alone. When one goes back thirty generations, that generational line mathematically has more than a billion autosomal DNA ancestors, but only one female mtDNA ancestor, and one male Y-DNA ancestor, which all it takes to produce the next generation. For me to be kicked off of FTDNA blogs shows that FTDNA is a corporate money making machine and does not care anything about families except in profit dollars, for putting they say to much online. It is minute, in amount, it is the others which are not putting enough online which is where the complaint should be made.
Mark ElliottMark Elliott
Mark ElliottMark Elliott
14 hours ago
https://www.v-stetsyuk.name/en/Topo/Eng.html Gail Andrews Hardy T124143 9 hours ago Maybe so, but what you are showing is the name distribution in Europe, i.e., Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Austria, Luxembourg. DNA travels with language, the names, which carry the Y-DNA are Anglo-Saxon, like the name Ewald/Elwald for me which has R-U106 a proto-germanic DNA. The name ‘John’ is used predominately on the Scottish-English border. Anglo-Saxon place name localities correlate well where the name ‘John’ is utilized as a forname. Before people having two or more names they had a single one, which evolved into forenames and surnames. With these names traveled the Y-DNA. Mine with the Anglo-Saxon variant of Elwald, given the meaning of ‘elk (moose) of the forest’. It seem like it is with some indigenous American Nations names of what wildlife are names after like ‘wolf’, ‘bear’, and ‘elk (moose)’ were also utilized by the Anglo-Saxon, indigenous European people. https://nvk.genealogy.net/map/1890:wolf https://wolfeducationinternational.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/GermanyWolfMap.png The migration of the name coincides with the individual, called ‘John’ or ‘Wolf’, and that correlation seems to correlate well with European Anglo-Saxon, name places. https://www.peopleofthebritishisles.org/ Has shown strong support in their studies that People of the British Isles have a strong percent of Anglo-Saxon in them.
Mark ElliottMark Elliott
Yesterday at 7:36pm
https://nvk.genealogy.net/map/1890:Robert,1890:John,1890:Will,1890:David ‘John’ number one preferred forename among Armstrong-Elliot(t).
Mark Elliott
Yesterday at 9:16am
Like Gail Andrews Hardy T124143 2 hours ago How does this pertain to Northumberland? Unlike You like this Mark Elliott 7 minutes ago “The Kingdom of Northumbria was a medieval Anglian kingdom in what is now Northern England and south-east Scotland. The name derives from the Old English Norþan-hymbre meaning “the people or province north of the Humber”, which reflects the approximate southern limit to the kingdom’s territory, the Humber Estuary.” Wikipedia Before Roxburghshire, and Northumberland the name was Danish ‘Northumbria’. At this time the name ‘John’ was likely utilized as a personal name without surname, which came up from today’s southern Poland-Germany region, where the Anglo-Saxon have traveled out of. So the personal of ‘John’, became not a surname, but the promenade for names in the northern region of Northumbria (Lotia-Northumberland), and when the border between the Kingdoms of England and Scotland was placed it was placed across families utilizing the name ‘John’ as a personal name then a forename. Like

https://nvk.genealogy.net/map/1890:John,1890:Johns,1890:Johnson,1890:Johnsen

John > Johns > Johnson   1890

https://forebears.io/surnames/johnson

https://named.publicprofiler.org/

1/23/2020 MSE

https://www.familytreedna.com/public/U106?iframe=ycolorized Maybe there is a reason that I am being barred from FTDNA R-U106.  1/23/2020 MSE

FTDNA Johnson, but not Johnston or Johnstone

The concept of majority rules desecrates and destroys the concept, of any family history or genealogy being done on the FTDNA Johnson, blog, which is extremely destructive to the surnames Johnstone and Johnston, the first Johnstone, is a Scottish place name which derives the second which is an Ulster name Johnston. Unlike the extreme majority name Johnson which is the Anglo naming pattern as being ‘the son of John’.

https://named.publicprofiler.org/

Connecting with Your Clan Johnstone Heritage with Jamesie Johnston of Albannach  http://www.clanjohnstone.org/

 

 

FTDNA Clan Johnson

 

Have a single upload from elwald.com;

FTDNA Argyll Colony NC, USA – Elwald

FTDNA Argyll Colony NC, USA

 

I am Mark Stephen Elliott, son of Loren Spencer Elliott;

Utilizing my over a half century of genealogical, family history experience, FTDNA Y-DNA, back in time, and FTDNA is censoring me from blogs, which may help me as with my background and experience to push my Y-DNA line of the father’s father back in line. They aredefinitely a profit making industry are being extremely destruct to the objective I tested my Y-DNA, and that was find my father’s line further back in time. That is why I paid money for the Y-DNA testing; I and everyone else kicked off of an FTDNA blog, should acquire in a mass lawsuit a refund. 12/5/2019 Mark Stephen Elliott.

Am even afraid to try to become a full administrator on the FTDNA Argyll Colony, North Carolina blog for fear they will kick me off and will not be able to service it.

Now because admin are kicking people off the FTDNA blogs. The information of these blogs can be extremely destructive when applied to the use of family history. The admin which do not kick people off their FTDNA blogs have viable and useful blogs. FTDNA allowing the admin to kick people off blogs makes these blog extremely useless to genealogical research. Anyone being kick off a FTDNA blog makes an extreme undervaluation of these service as an applicable Y-DNA family history down the father’s line search site, and deserve a refund. Mark Stephen Elliott 12/5/2019.

 

https://forebears.io/surnames/johnson

http://www.irishorigenes.com/johnson

 

 

https://forebears.io/surnames/johnston

httpd://www.irishorigenes.com/johnston

 

 

https://forebears.io/surnames/johnstone

http://www.irishorigenes.com/johnstone

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

https://named.publicprofiler.org/

http://named.publicprofiler.org/

From the Muster Roll Of  The County Of Fermanagh  1631 (21 Johnston, 6 Ellot, 2 Armstrong)

http://www.ulsterancestry.com/muster-roll_1663.html

 

 

Sheep-stealers-from-the-north-of-England-the-Riding-Clans-in-Ulster-by-Robert-Bell

Surname, via forename, by adding “s”&”son”

http://named.publicprofiler.org/

http://worldnames.publicprofiler.org/

http://forebears.io/surnames/Johnson

http://forebears.io/surnames/Johnston

http://forebears.io/surnames/Johnstone

http://forebears.io/surnames/Johansen

http://forebears.io/surnames/Johansson

FTDNA results link;

https://www.familytreedna.com/public/Johnson/default.aspx?section=yresults

 

 

 

 

 

Armstrong, Elliot, Crozier, Nixon, Johnson, Graham; Ulster-Scot.

St. Andrews (Andreas), Proto-Germanic Linguistic Evolution

3/14/2018  MSE

 

I-M223;

Johnston of Ireland, four of Scotland, with one Johnstone of England

Armstrong, Elliot(t), Johnston(e), and Graham.

Fegus Graham of The Mote, and Richard Graham of Netherbye.

3/15/2018 MSE

I-M253;

Johnston

Johnson, in some cases could be derived from the Swedish Johansson. Could have branched Y-DNA in Denmark, with a branch going to Sweden another group towards east Anglia, most likely as a personnel name previous to surnames of John(Johan), the name then became in Sweden Johansson “the son of Johan” in Anglo-Saxon, Danish Northumbria, pre-England, Johnson, meaning “the son of John”, though in the same fashion as the Gaelic “MacJohn”, if existed would mean the same.

Johnston(e), from Johnstoun, is a locality, likely at first a farmstead, then a toun/town, where some on of the locality would be referred to as example; “William de Johnston”, meaning at first “William from Johnston”, then the “de/from” would be drop, with the name becoming “William Johnston”.  Johnston the locality the name came from was within Annandale near the I-M253 Carruthers (from the nearby locality of Karruther/Carruther, Annandale, also there are Moffat from nearby Moffat, Annandale, few with I-M253) of the region with excepting NPEs, most likely unlike the surname Johnston, may have received their I-M253 from a single individual, which the nearby Armstrong think is a Fairbairn, which also shows I-M253 of the Scottish eastern borderlands, with excepting NPEs. There could be some truth that the border I-M253 did come from a Dane, with reference to Fairbairn, as the allied Armstrong have proposed.

Carruthers I-M253 Y-DNA

 

http://www.armstrongclan.info/clan-history.html
Armstrong Clan History-Armstrong Origins
A traditional story claims that the Armstrong clan progenitor was Fairbairn, an armour bearer to a king of Scotland, who rescued his master when he had his horse killed under him in battle. Fairbairn allegedly grasped the king by his thigh and set him on his own horse. An astonishing feat of strength that cynics suggest was a physical impossibility due to the weight of medieval armour.

http://www.genealogy.com/forum/surnames/topics/fairbairn/499/
Where Did The Fairbairns Come From?
By Thomas Fairbairn March 12, 2010 at 02:04:40

Although there is more than one story about the origins of the Fairbairns, perhaps one of the most widely accepted is the saga of Siward. The Viking, also known as Siward Fairbairn of the Strong Arm. Siward was the son of a Danish King and lived in England from about 995 till his death in 1056.In those days, the ruler of any small territory was a king, so exactly where his father, Hringo, King of Upland, also known as Earl Beorn, would fall on the yardstick of earthly royalty is not clear; however, at the very least, he would be considered of noble birth.

Armstrong Fairbairn I-M253 Y-DNA

3/16/2018 MSE

Muirhall Hermitage Castle wind farm

 

North Carolina, Argyll Colony oriented;

For Johnston, Johnston are likely of, Ulster, Ireland, like my family which migrated into the Carolina (my family into Massachusetts, some people are lucky and get to go to the Carolina) , likely as Anglican Scots (if your family is Presbyterian, then likely Co Antrim-Down, but if Episcopalian Methodist then Co Fermanagh), and for their info am providing these links; https://www.google.com/maps/place/Johnston+County,+NC/@34.7276391,-78.3358626,7.83z/ https://www.google.com/maps/place/Johnston,+SC+29832/@31.4587824,-89.1353125,6.08z/

3/21/2018 MSE

5/11/2018 MSE

https://www.libraryireland.com/gregg/mapping-ulster-scots.php

8/26/2018 MSE

‘Sheep stealers from the north of England’: the Riding Clans in Ulster by Robert Bell

Search the Muster Rolls

In 1630 Ulster it is Johnston, Ellot, and Scot, forms of spellings which were used.

8/26/2018 MSE

12/5/2019 MSE

Posted in Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*